Cartae Sacrorum De Congregatio Americas
Americas Union Charter
Article 32 - Member Dispute, Arbitration and Discipline
The operation of the laws of the Union in relation to member discipline shall always operate on the Golden Rule of Law and Supreme Confession of Law and therefore the principles of the presumption of innocence, the right to fair justice, rules of evidence and the conditional right of appeal.
By the present Charter, an offence shall be any act or intended act by an individual or group which willingly contravenes the present Charter and any subsequent laws having been ratified and upheld by the appropriate branches of the Union.
(i) Offences explicitly listed in the presentCharter, which may or may not result in automatic suspension of certain rights; and
When any alleged offence is listed against a member of an alternate non-Ucadian society, an equivalent suit must be initiated within the Courts of the Union to enable the Society to hear the allegations against the member. All evidence and material held by the non-Ucadian society must then be relinquished to the higher jurisdiction for review.
When a Union court has a matter listed for review and hearing against one or more allegations against a member, no non-Ucadian society has any jurisdiction to usurp such authority and must yield to the higher jurisdiction.
However, should a suit fail to be created of equivalent charges and allegations by a Union court in a timely manner enabling the matter to be heard and resolved, then both the society and the member yield and claim of higher jurisdiction to the inferior non-Ucadian society.
As a matter of law and justice, all allegations must be heard and resolved no matter what society they are issued. The quashing of a charge in one court of a non-Ucadian society and jurisdiction does not automatically mean the matter cannot or should not be heard and resolved satisfactorily by the law within a court of the Union.
All members have the right to a fair appeal in accordance with the rules and procedures of the Union.
Where the government of a Ucadia University or Province is found to be in direct breach of an article of the present Charter and upon written notification has failed to indicate either a willingness to comply, or has failed to make necessary steps to comply within 120 days, it shall be a requirement of the government of the Union to pass such legislation that disciplines the member state as way of punishment for the non compliance.
In the framing of such punitive actions, the government of the Union must make every effort to see that diplomatic representations are exhausted first before any economic action is considered.
Action to expel the government of a University or Province from the Union is expressly forbidden under this Charter and any such legal act or motion shall be immediately deemed null and void, even if such action has the vote and support of other members.
While the Union by its legal status holds primacy over its members in relation to the articles of the present Charter, the sovereignty of University Society is without contest. Therefore any punitive action proposed against a member state that is in direct breach of one or more of the articles of this Charter must not consider military action as a course, unless it relates specifically to one of the following criteria:
(i) That an act of genocide against significant numbers of citizens of the member state is currently being undertaken with the knowing support of the Executive Government and that the Executive Government has refused to halt such actions after all other measures have been exhausted; or
(ii) That a coup has occurred removing a legitimately and duly elected Executive Government from power and that such leaders of the coup have refused after repeated requests to return democratic and legitimate rule to the people of the member state; or